Search
Francois Donze

Setting Bios and Storage Controller Properties with Redfish®

July 19, 2018

Updated March 5, 2024

The concept of deferred / pending settings in the Bios and SmartStorageConfig subsystems of HPE iLO 5 is briefly presented in the HPE Reference API documentation. With two examples, this document illustrates what is happening when properties are modified in those subsystems using the Redfish REST API against HPE servers.

NOTE: The SmartStorageConfigdata type is deprecated in HPE iLO 6 based servers.

NOTE: The latest versions of iLO 5 firmware support both the HPE SmartStorageConfig and the DMTF standard storage models. Volume management with controllers implementing the DMTF storage model is described in the HPE server management portal.

We assume that the reader is familiar with REST APIs in general and Redfish in particular. A good entry point for developers to grasp the power of Redfish is the iLO RESTful API Ecosystem.

Foreword

For didactic purposes, we use direct URIs to targets instead of crawling the Redfish tree to discover the target URIs, as explained in the Getting Started with the Redfish® API Part 2 blog post.

In the following paragraphs, {{Subsystem-URI}} refers to an URI like https://<ilo-IP>/redfish/v1/<subsystem>/ where <subsystem> represents either Bios or SmartStorageConfig. These subsystems contains the currently used properties.

Each of them has a pending sub-zone called Settings/ and explained in the next paragraph.

Deferred / pending high level concept description

  1. Modifications in these subsystems are performed using HTTP PATCH or HTTP PUT against {{Subsystem-URI}}/Settings/.
  2. Upon a successful transaction, the HTTP return code is 200 OK with the associated message: One or more properties were changed and will not take effect until the system is reset.
  3. During the next system reset, the content of {{Subsystem-URI}}/Settings/ is transferred one level up, in {{Subsystem-URI}}/. The return status of this transfer is present in {{Subsystem-URI}} with an associated message.

The important thing to note in this flow is that the final status code and associated message of a property setting is visible after the system reset.

Successful example

In this example, we create a Raid1 storage array of two physical disks using Postman. To achieve this goal, we have to issue a PUT to {{iloURI}}/redfish/v1/Systems/1/SmartStorageConfig/Settings/ with a body (aka payload) similar to the example shown below:

Body to PUT to .../SmartStorageConfig/Settings/

Upon successful completion of this PUT request, the HTTP status return code is 200 OK, which means that the remote Web server understood what to do with this well-formed payload.

The Body of the HTTP response contains an error property with a SystemResetRequired message. This property is a Redfish object sent by the Redfish server. It is there to give details about the next step to perform to finish the modification process.

PUT Return Status

At this stage of the process, only the staging / "pending zone" of the Smart Array has changed and contains the PUT payload. We can verify this assertion by comparing the content of {{Subsystem-URI}}/Settings/ with the content of {{Subsystem-URI/}}.

In the pending zone (.../SmartStorageConfig/Settings/) we can see the payload we sent to the Redfish server. However, in the "running zone" (.../SmartStorageConfig/) the LogicalDrives array is still empty:

GET Pending and Current LogicalDrives

It is now time to reset the server and perform a GET of the running zone. In the response body of this operation, the first Redfish object is a @Redfish.Settings collection containing a single MessageID mentioning Success. This single message is synonym of a successful transfer of the "pending zone" in to the "running zone". We will see later in this document what we get in case of an un-successful transfer.

GET Running zone after server reset

Further down in this response we find the LogicalDrives array containing the Raid1 disk array:

GET LogicalDrives from running zone

Unsuccessful example

In order to emphasize the fact that the modification status of properties in the Bios and SmartStorage subsystems must be done after a system reset, we will study a case where the JSON PUT payload is syntactically correct but embedding a value typo (Raid instead of Raid1) and missing a required key-value (DataGuard=Disabled):

PUT of a bad payload

Sending this request returns an HTTP 200 OK status and a SystemResetRequired Redfish message just like in the previous example:

PUT return status of bad Redfish request

The pending zone contains the faulty payload:

Faulty payload in pending zone

After the server reset, a GET of the running zone responds with a MessageArgs=[DataGuard] object and two MessageIDkeys. The first one mentions DataGuard as a missing property and the second one (Success) means that the analysis of the transfer from the pending zone to the running zone has successfully ended. This Success message does not means that the transfer has occurred.

Moreover, note that there is nothing mentioning the Raid typo. It means that analysis of the payload to transfer stops at the first error found.

DataGuard Property Missing

If we drill down to the LogicalDrives array we notice that it is still empty. Hence the transfer did not occur.

Empty LogicalDrives array

If we PUT a new payload with the DataGuard=Disabled property but still without correct Raid level and reset the server, we notice an InvalidRAIDLevel message explaining the problem.

Wrong Raid Level error

Conclusion

Understanding the pending / deferred process when modifying Bios and SmartStorage properties using the Redfish API as well as the different types of return codes (HTTP, MessageID...) should ease program development and troubleshooting sessions.

Don't forget to check out some of my other blog posts on the HPE Developer portal to learn more about Redfish tips and tricks.

Related

Nathan Lin

Accessing iLO Redfish APIs and HPE OneView APIs on Ansible AWX

Feb 9, 2021
HPE Global Sales Engineering (GSE) team

Automate boot from SAN target configurations using Redfish

Jun 1, 2023
François Donzé

Benefits of the Platform Level Data Model for Firmware Update Standard

Jun 7, 2022
François Donzé

Build your own iLO Redfish simulator

Jun 11, 2021
François Donzé

CHIF driver not found

Jun 22, 2021
Gokul Sreeramaiah

Configuring threads for Optimal performance in HPE PowerShell Cmdlets

Dec 3, 2018
HPE DEV staff

COVID-19 limits accessibility – Free offer for HPE iLO Advanced opens it up

Apr 23, 2020
Matthew Kocurek - iLOREST Developer

Creating a Python version that enforces FIPS

Feb 15, 2018

HPE Developer Newsletter

Stay in the loop.

Sign up for the HPE Developer Newsletter or visit the Newsletter Archive to see past content.

By clicking on “Subscribe Now”, I agree to HPE sending me personalized email communication about HPE and select HPE-Partner products, services, offers and events. I understand that my email address will be used in accordance with HPE Privacy Statement. You may unsubscribe from receiving HPE and HPE-Partner news and offers at any time by clicking on the Unsubscribe button at the bottom of the newsletter.

For more information on how HPE manages, uses, and protects your personal data please refer to HPE Privacy Statement.